E.S.C.O.N.I.


                                                       

        

 

DECEMBER  2002

                           SVP Talks From Oklahoma Meeting

Here are notes on some of the interesting talks that were presented in early October.

Elephant bird embryo - Amy Balanoff and Tim Rowe report exciting CT scan of the egg of an extinct elephant bird, Aepyornis allowed them to see the bones of the embryo and reconstruct them with rapid prototyping. In this way they can study the copies of the bones outside the shell without damaging the egg or the embryo. This is very exciting because of the implications for this procedure and method. They can see amazing detail in the skull including things like the path of arteries into the braincase. The postcranial skeleton was not as developed due to the early age of the embryo but should be helpful in determining the growth pattern of the elephant bird.

Mososaur soft tissue – N. Geist et al report on a Kansas mososaur specimen of Platecarpus found with extensive preservation of soft tissue including integument. There are two large stains which may have been indications of internal organs, possible the liver and kidney. Analysis of the stains showed high concentrations of high molecular weight organic compounds and iron not found in the nearby matrix.

Paul Sereno – Abelisaurid Theropods from Africa: Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Implications. There were two new abelisaurids that he found in Niger.

Jack Horner and Glenn Storrs – Keratinous Covered Dinosaur Skulls. The skulls of horned dinosaurs like Triceratops are known to have groves along its surface believed to have been for blood vessels to the epidermal layer. They believe that the keratinous sheath may have covered the whole skull top and bottom.

Lawrence Witmer, Chatterjee et al– Anatomy of the Brain and Vestibular Area of two Pterosaurs: Implications for Flight, Head Posture, Behavior. Acid prepped skulls of a more basal Rhamphorhyncus from Solnhofen and a Cretaceous Anhanguera were compared. Pterosaurs had relatively smaller brains per body size than birds probably because of birds evolution from larger brained dinosaurs. The large semicircular canals indicate a well refined organ of equilibrium. However, the orientation of the vestibular apparatus relative to the long axis of the skull was different indicating very different head postures. Rhamphorhyncus had a horizontal orientation while that of Anhanguera was strongly angled down. These should affect feeding and aerodynamic effects.

Gary Bir and Robert Bakker – Dinosaur Social Life: Evidence from Shed Tooth Demography. Using crocs as a model they determined that in the Late Jurassic Como Bluff area baby croc teeth were only found in sheltered areas where they were protected by parents. The larger teeth of juveniles and adults were found in open water sites. Few teeth from large adults are found because few live that long. They found that this trend was true for theropod dinosaurs in Como also with hatchling teeth found in association with those of older juveniles and adults. They also determined that they had a 100 times better chance of reaching adulthood than crocs.

David Krause et al – Claw Geometry is an Indicator of the Terrestrial Habits of Pterosaurs. They studied the claws of 100 pterosaurs and related them to the claws of birds to determine that pterosaurs were predominantly non-arboreal and walked bipedally, using their hand claws for food manipulation. The mean foot claw measurements were the same as those for walking birds while the hand claws were like the claws of perching birds.

Frank Sanders and Ken Carpenter – Mechanics of Stegosaur Tails as Weapons. A mathematical model was made based on the tailbones of a stegosaur, their maximum articulation angles, their degrees of freedom, and inferred muscle mass. A model was made of metal bones with springs as muscles and they calculated the range of movement (13 degrees from the median) and the maximum force generated (enough to easily pierce the skin of an Allosaurus). There is a damaged Allosaur tail vertebra and a stegosaur with a broken spike that might have become embedded in an attacking allosaur.

Scale to Feather Transition Explained

The University of California has shown experimental steps in the origin and development of feathers using molecular biology. A Nature article by C. Chuong et al try to tackle the problem of the first feather because of all the new Chinese feathered bird specimens being reported. Are they feathers, protofeathers or something else entirely? A common belief is that the scales elongated into rachides that then became notched to form barbs. But there was no real evidence to back that theory up. Here it is reported that the barbs form first and then fuse into the rachia. Unstructured feathers or downy feathers are made up of just the barbs and barbules with no rachis. These downy feathers were studied on chickens. This study is a good example of the popular new combined study of evolutionary biology and developmental biology called “Evo-Devo”. They studied the growth of new downy feathers after plucking them out of chickens and adjusting the expression levels of the genes (including the popular sonic hedgehog gene) involved. The result was many abnormal feathers with rachides and barbs. Each of the three genes studied caused different changes in the organization of the new feathers. The authors still feel that the transition of down to flight feathers was probably a very long process that may have taken 50 MY to be refined. However, now they have a better feel for how it could have happened. This study should also shed some light on the development of other epithelial organs like hairs, lungs, and many more.

Why Sharks Have Hammerheads

An article by Adam Summers in the November Natural History explains theories about the hammerhead shark. Common theories are that it improves sensory perception or that it improves hydrodynamics (the use to hammer prey is discounted as the delicate eyes are at the hammering ends). The wide head spread the gel filled electroreceptors used to detect prey. In tests they were able to sense prey from a greater distance than sharks with regular heads. The wide head also seems to stabilize them during turns allowing them to turn faster as well. They also have found that the heads seem to be getting smaller as they evolve.

 

                 Karen Nordquist, ESCONI Paleontology Study Group

Featured Web Sites

Field Museum of Natural History

SVP Society for Vertebrate Paleontology 


Return To Home Page Return To Karens Komments | Go to November 2002 

Last Updated 11/24/2007

Hit Counter  Number Of Visitors Since 3/23/2005