E.S.C.O.N.I.


                                                       

        

 

JUNE  2003

                                 

         New Tetrapod from Mazon Creek

Jason Anderson from the University of Toronto reports in the new Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology on a new fossil found at Mazon Creek by Dr. Bill Turnbull (Curator Emeritus in Geology at The Field Museum) and his late wife Priscilla in 1953. They named it Phlegethontia in 1955 but further preparation has revealed new features that gave rise to its new name. It is now named Pseudophlegethonia turnbullorum in their honor and is a new genus and species. This animal fills a gap between two known similar elongate legless tetrapods – It has 140 vertebrae, about 86 pairs of “k” shaped ribs and distinctive skull bones with a pointed snout, and reduced dermal scales. The vertebrae have ribs until the 88th or 90th vertebra and there is some indication of pectoral bones near the third vertebra, although it is not clear. There are no indications of hip bones. This specimen also has thin fine gastralia on its lower side and no osteoderms along its back. It was found in the deep marine Essex area and must have been washed there from land. This new animal is included in with Lepospondyli that may have given rise to amphibians. A puzzle is that these animals appear full blown without any known links. This holotype specimen has both part and counterpart in reasonably good shape with some weathering as it was found open.

            First Gut Contents of a Fossil Primate

A report in the Journal of Human Evolution by Franzen and Wilde reports on a study of a fossil of an adapiform, Godinotia neglecta, from Messel in Germany but now housed in Wyoming. It is from the lower Middle Miocene and is dated to 49 MYA. There are two pieces with one holding the skull, shoulder girdle and arms and the second holding the pelvis, some lumbar and caudal vertebrae and hind limbs. Both have an outline from the body caused by bacterial decomposition. The gut content is preserved as a thin dark brown layer. It was difficult to determine but they did find a part of what they believe is the cuticular body of a fruit. They can not determine which fruit it was and did find evidence of additional cuticle material. In addition, they found two types of leaf structures that appear to be from flowering angiosperms. This shows that this early primate had a frugivorous-folivorous diet. They did not find chitin material that would be expected if the animal had been an insectivore. The fruit and leaf diet of this animal is like that of lemurs.

            Madagascar Cannibal Theropods

In Nature, Rogers and Krause et al. report that they have found a lot of evidence that indicates that the large Cretaceous Madagascar theropod Majungatholus atopus was a cannibal. At more than 20 cases at 3 sites there are bones of the theropod with scars made by serrated teeth. The marks showed teeth with denticles that were spaced at about 0.48 mm apart, and that matches those of Majungatholus at about 0.5 mm. The tooth spacing of the theropod was 10 to 17 mm apart that also match the bone markings. The measurements rule out the other theropod known at that time (Masiakasaurus knopflere) or the large crocs known then. This does not however tell us whether it preyed on its fellow dinos or scavenged its remains. Even today some animals like Komodo dragons and crocs show cannibalistic behavior.

It is interesting that the other case for dinosaur cannibalism was with fossils of adult Coelophysis with young babies found in their bellies. This is now being questioned because these young animals appear to be beneath the adults. It will be interesting to see future reports on this case

            Paleocrime Doesn’t Pay Again

The BLM reports on the punishment for another fossil thief. Rene Quammen of Otto, Wyoming was found excavating fossils on public lands in September 2001. BLM accused him of digging illegal fossils for commercial sale and personal profit. He damaged fossils in some cases and did not record collection information. A search of his property turned up thousands of specimens, photographs and sales records. In some cases he also damaged sites of other institutions (the Smithsonian was one). He was found guilty and received 30 days in jail, two years probation (can not enter federal lands), and must pay $7,375 in restitution, $500 in fines, and $75 in court cases. All of his vertebrate fossils were also confiscated.

                Ancient DNA Found in Permafrost Soil

Even when no bones are found in permafrost lands, they are finding DNA from plant and animal life that will help to tell the story of life years ago. It may shed light on what kinds of plants lived during the Ice Ages and when humans crossed into North America. The plant DNA is probably from the roots. How can they do that with animals when there are no bones? They believe that the animals DNA is from urine and feces left behind. A report from researchers at the University of Copenhagen reveal DNA from Siberian plants believed to be 400,000 years old. Apparently permafrost is a good place for preservation because it is always cold. So far they have identified 19 plant taxa including angiosperms, gymnosperms, and mosses. They have DNA from 8 animals including mammoths, horses, reindeer, hares, and steppe bisons. Some of the animal DNA is estimated to be 30,000 years old. Soil from New Zealand caves has been identified as being the DNA from the extinct moa indicating that dry soil can also preserve DNA for some time (in this case about 1,000 years). They have looked at the DNA from Beringia to help to understand the climate and the plant life that existed there when animal life moved to North America. There is similar work being done with Antarctic soils and other areas. The one caution mentioned is the possibility of mixing of soil levels that could affect the dating.

                Bakker is Back!!!

“Raptor Pack” a new novel by Bob Bakker is coming out this June and is available at prepublication discounts at Barnes & Noble. It is illustrated by Michael Skrepnick and is aimed at the younger reader. Also coming in June is an article in Discovery Magazine about Bakker titled “Dinosaur Family Values”. Once again he is stepping into tricky territory with stories of dinosaur behavior. He believes that these savage predators were really nurturing protective family oriented animals. Here is some of what is in the article. Bakker has been working on a shed tooth theory and believes that the locations where many shed teeth are found are communal feeding areas or lairs. Meaty parts of dinos were carried there for all to feast on leaving many of their shed teeth along with the bones. In 13 sites in Como Bluff teeth of adult and young allosaurs are found. And these teeth are similar in structure meaning that both age groups ate the same food. But where are the teeth of teenagers? They are found near perennial lakeshores where they must have migrated during the dry season. He also believes that the whole camarasaur teeth rather than shed teeth found indicate that they were migrating without stopping to eat. When high numbers of shed teeth are found – these are feeding areas. He also states that finding clean complete dino skeletons is near useless. The chewed up partial skeletons have more to tell. In addition the article discusses the reaction of other paleontologists to Bakker’s style of research. He seems to avoid peer reviewed journals to publish. But his shed tooth theory is scheduled to be published by the University of Indiana Press. Jack Horner argues that dinosaurs are always shedding teeth and that doesn’t mean that it is a feeding area.

            Clovis People Not Guilty

11,500 years ago most believe that the arrival of the Clovis people with their fluted stone points was the cause of the disappearance of many large mammals. In Journal of World Prehistory, Grayson and Meltzer report on studies of 27 sites where Clovis people and large mammals were prominent. Only 14 of the 27 sites showed signs of killing or butchering with impact-fractured projectile points, cut marks on bones or skeletal dismemberment. Those sites had mammoths and mastodons present. There were no signs of the other 33 genus of mammals known to be present then. There were tools made from bones of large mammals but they gave no indication that they were hunted for that purpose. They also argue that the extinctions occurred in Europe and Asia without the presence of Clovis people. The authors suggest that perhaps a widespread climate change is a more reasonable explanation for the extinctions.

            Paleocene/Eocene Boundary Mammal Changes

About 55 MYA several groups of mammals suddenly appeared on the Northern Continents during a period of global warming. This was the wave of modern animals that replaced the more archaic forms that went extinct. The Bighorn Basin in Wyoming is an excellent source of information because it provides a continuous sequence of rock for that period. Above the P/E (Paleocene/Eocene) boundary we find primates, artiodactyls and opossum-like marsupials as well as carnivorous Hyaenodontidae that later go extinct. They differ so much from the local precursors that they are not believed to have evolved in situ. The pattern appears to be similar in Europe although the fossil record is not as good. Although dating has been a problem in some Asian sites, it is now believed that some of these mammals were in Asia before the P/E and would have been the source for the European and North American animals. This report strengthens the Asian claim to the birthplace of many mammal groups including the primates.

          Karen Nordquist, ESCONI Paleontology Study Group

Featured Web Sites

Field Museum of Natural History

SVP Society for Vertebrate Paleontology 


Return To Home Page Return To Karens Komments | Go to Karens Komments May 2003 

Last Updated 8/6/2003

Hit Counter  Number Of Visitors Since 3/23/2005